ENVA vs. NXT
ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) and NXT (Nextracker Inc) are both stocks. ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while NXT operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 3 years, ENVA returned 49.36%/yr vs 46.10%/yr for NXT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENVA vs. NXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENVA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than NXT's 44.24% return.
ENVA
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 77.69%
- 3Y*
- 49.36%
- 5Y*
- 36.19%
- 10Y*
- 36.71%
NXT
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 44.24%
- 6M
- 40.08%
- 1Y
- 113.26%
- 3Y*
- 46.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENVA vs. NXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 9.12% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 9.41% |
NXT Nextracker Inc | 44.24% | 138.46% | -22.03% | 53.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENVA and NXT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2023 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
ENVA:
$4.52B
NXT:
$19.43B
ENVA:
$12.29
NXT:
$3.83
ENVA:
13.95
NXT:
32.79
ENVA:
0.76
NXT:
0.01
ENVA:
1.39
NXT:
5.40
ENVA:
3.22
NXT:
8.32
ENVA:
$3.28B
NXT:
$3.56B
ENVA:
$1.23B
NXT:
$1.16B
ENVA:
$456.13M
NXT:
$731.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENVA vs. NXT — Risk / Return Rank
ENVA
NXT
ENVA vs. NXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Nextracker Inc (NXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENVA | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.90 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 10.31 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENVA | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.75 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.88 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ENVA vs. NXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENVA drawdown since its inception was -81.56%, which is greater than NXT's maximum drawdown of -48.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVA and NXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENVA | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.56% | -48.61% | -32.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -23.27% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.01% | -48.61% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -19.66% | +17.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -15.32% | -14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 11.03% | -1.46% |
Volatility
ENVA vs. NXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) is 10.45%, while Nextracker Inc (NXT) has a volatility of 28.03%. This indicates that ENVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENVA | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 28.03% | -17.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.16% | 49.14% | -20.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.08% | 65.09% | -27.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 60.66% | -20.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 60.66% | -11.44% |
Dividends
ENVA vs. NXT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENVA nor NXT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ENVA vs. NXT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enova International, Inc. and Nextracker Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENVA vs. NXT - Profitability Comparison
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nextracker Inc reported a gross profit of 297.38M and revenue of 880.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
NXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nextracker Inc reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 880.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
NXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nextracker Inc reported a net income of 150.60M and revenue of 880.52M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENVA and NXT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXT has higher volatility (28.03%) compared to ENVA (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVA dropped -81.56% vs NXT's -48.61%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENVA and NXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer