ENSG vs. UHS
ENSG (The Ensign Group, Inc.) and UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Medical Care Facilities industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, ENSG returned 23.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UHS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENSG vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENSG achieves a -10.18% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -34.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ENSG has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 23.68%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.
ENSG
- 1D
- -8.15%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -10.18%
- 6M
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.68%
UHS
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -15.82%
- YTD
- -34.32%
- 6M
- -36.67%
- 1Y
- -24.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
ENSG vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | -10.18% | 31.33% | 18.62% | 18.89% | 12.98% | 15.43% | 61.43% | 25.53% | 75.67% | 0.78% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -34.32% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENSG and UHS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2007 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
ENSG:
$6.15
UHS:
$31.29
ENSG:
25.44
UHS:
4.57
ENSG:
1.68
UHS:
0.20
ENSG:
1.75
UHS:
0.39
ENSG:
$5.27B
UHS:
$17.76B
ENSG:
$800.38M
UHS:
$12.01B
ENSG:
$590.49M
UHS:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENSG vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
ENSG
UHS
ENSG vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENSG | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.88 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.59 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | -1.46 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENSG | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | -0.76 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.05 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.03 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.44 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
ENSG vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENSG drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, smaller than the maximum UHS drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENSG and UHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENSG | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.57% | -60.27% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.50% | -41.52% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.50% | -41.52% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.50% | -44.90% | +17.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.57% | -56.30% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.50% | -41.30% | +13.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -14.80% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 16.71% | -8.34% |
Volatility
ENSG vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 6.50%. This indicates that ENSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENSG | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 6.50% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 25.04% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.98% | 32.08% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 31.80% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.09% | 34.38% | +1.71% |
Dividends
ENSG vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
ENSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than UHS's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | 0.16% | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.67% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
ENSG vs. UHS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Ensign Group, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENSG vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison
ENSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.37M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ENSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 124.85M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
ENSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a net income of 99.67M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENSG and UHS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENSG has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to UHS (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENSG dropped -55.57% vs UHS's -60.27%.
ENSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENSG and UHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer