PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENFR vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENFR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.99%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


ENFR

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.80%
YTD
24.34%
6M
23.38%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
27.67%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
11.99%

VTI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.44%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.34%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.05%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and VTI is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.51

The correlation between ENFR and VTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENFR vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENFR
VTI

Energy

98.8%
3.7%

Industrials

3.4%
9.8%

Utilities

1.0%
2.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
12.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.5%

Energy

ENFR
98.8%
VTI
3.7%

Industrials

ENFR
3.4%
VTI
9.8%

Utilities

ENFR
1.0%
VTI
2.3%

Financial Services

ENFR
0.2%
VTI
12.0%

Basic Materials

ENFR

-

VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

ENFR

-

VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ENFR

-

VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

ENFR

-

VTI
4.7%

Healthcare

ENFR

-

VTI
9.2%

Real Estate

ENFR

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

ENFR

-

VTI
33.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENFR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENFRVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.81

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

12.85

-4.78

ENFR vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENFRVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.02

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.71

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.81

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.50

-0.16

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENFRVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-55.45%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.92%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-19.30%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-25.36%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

-35.00%

-27.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-2.64%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-8.02%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.95%

+1.25%

Volatility

ENFR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.88%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENFRVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.88%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

9.55%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

12.44%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

17.44%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

18.33%

+6.35%

ENFR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENFR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.03%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENFR and VTI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to VTI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.84% vs 11.99% for ENFR. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.

ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENFR and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer