PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENFR vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENFR vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.29% return.


ENFR

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.80%
YTD
24.34%
6M
23.38%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
27.67%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
11.99%

USHY

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.34%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%5.90%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.29%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and USHY is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.42

The correlation between ENFR and USHY shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENFR vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENFR
USHY

Energy

98.8%
99.2%

Industrials

3.4%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

-

Energy

ENFR
98.8%
USHY
99.2%

Industrials

ENFR
3.4%
USHY

-

Utilities

ENFR
1.0%
USHY

-

Financial Services

ENFR
0.2%
USHY

-

Basic Materials

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Communication Services

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Consumer Defensive

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Healthcare

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Real Estate

ENFR

-

USHY
0.8%

Technology

ENFR

-

USHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENFR vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENFRUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.83

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

12.68

-4.61

ENFR vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENFRUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.88

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.57

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENFRUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-22.44%

-45.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-2.43%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-4.66%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-15.56%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-0.41%

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-2.66%

-13.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.54%

+2.66%

Volatility

ENFR vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENFRUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

1.13%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

2.95%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

3.67%

+10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

7.34%

+11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

8.25%

+16.43%

ENFR vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENFR vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than USHY's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.03%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.93%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENFR and USHY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 19.49% vs 4.16% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 19.49% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 4.03% for ENFR.

ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.15% for USHY.

USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENFR and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer