ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENEL.MI (Enel SpA) is a stock, while FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) is China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, ENEL.MI returned 14.44%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for FHKCX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENEL.MI is traded in EUR, while FHKCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FHKCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENEL.MI achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 32.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENEL.MI having a 14.44% annualized return and FHKCX not far behind at 14.18%.

ENEL.MI

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 26.19%
• 3Y*: 24.29%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 14.44%

FHKCX

• 1D: -5.17%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: 32.19%
• 6M: 31.75%
• 1Y: 66.79%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 14.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENEL.MI Enel SpA	10.47%	37.33%	9.21%	43.23%	-23.69%	-11.12%	21.93%	47.28%	0.56%	25.73%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	32.19%	25.65%	31.28%	-3.28%	-19.15%	-7.23%	35.66%	38.17%	-13.56%	33.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ENEL.MI and FHKCX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.22

The correlation between ENEL.MI and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENEL.MI

ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 77
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENEL.MI	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	3.19	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.79	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.55	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	7.95	-5.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	21.72	-14.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENEL.MI and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENEL.MI	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	3.19	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.37	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.65	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.43	-0.13

Drawdowns

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENEL.MI drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -56.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENEL.MI and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENEL.MI	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.83%	-56.01%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	-8.57%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.49%	-23.70%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.05%	-42.63%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.08%	-49.34%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.15%	-6.45%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-18.11%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.13%	+0.53%

Volatility

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) is 5.95%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that ENEL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENEL.MI	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	8.55%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.22%	16.58%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.19%	21.35%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.07%	23.13%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.80%	21.88%	+0.92%

Dividends

ENEL.MI vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

ENEL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than FHKCX's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENEL.MI Enel SpA	5.07%	5.29%	6.24%	5.94%	7.55%	5.08%	3.96%	3.96%	2.36%	2.14%	1.91%	2.31%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.35%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENEL.MI and FHKCX in my portfolio?

ENEL.MI and FHKCX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.