EME vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) is a stock, while GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Over the past year, EME returned 68.85% vs 41.62% for GSIB. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EME vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 34.80% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 10.39% return.

EME

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -10.62%
• YTD: 34.80%
• 6M: 31.07%
• 1Y: 68.85%
• 3Y*: 68.15%
• 5Y*: 45.66%
• 10Y*: 33.38%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 41.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EME vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	34.80%	35.05%	111.27%	-1.46%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	10.39%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EME and GSIB is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.38

Return for Risk

EME vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 83
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 82

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 74
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EME vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EME	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.41	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.35	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.01	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	10.59	-3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EME vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EME	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.41	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	2.36	-1.76

Drawdowns

EME vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EME	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.56%	-17.71%	-52.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-13.90%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.71%	-1.13%	-11.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.36%	-2.06%	-13.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.02%	3.94%	+6.08%

Volatility

EME vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.58%. This indicates that EME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EME	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	4.58%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.46%	14.13%	+11.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.11%	17.39%	+20.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.30%	18.46%	+14.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.97%	18.46%	+14.51%

Dividends

EME vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GSIB's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.16%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.73%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EME and GSIB in my portfolio?

EME and GSIB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EME or GSIB?

EME has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EME dropped -70.56% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.