PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EME vs. DRX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EME vs. DRX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EME is traded in USD, while DRX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the DRX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 34.80% return, which is significantly higher than DRX.TO's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed DRX.TO with an annualized return of 33.38%, while DRX.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.50% annualized return.


EME

1D
0.78%
1M
-10.62%
YTD
34.80%
6M
31.07%
1Y
68.85%
3Y*
68.15%
5Y*
45.66%
10Y*
33.38%

DRX.TO

1D
-3.74%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
9.95%
6M
34.43%
1Y
51.22%
3Y*
41.16%
5Y*
40.17%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EME vs. DRX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
34.80%35.05%111.27%46.03%16.81%39.93%6.47%45.18%-26.68%16.09%
DRX.TO
ADF Group Inc.
9.95%-0.33%30.09%239.85%24.09%9.48%19.76%33.93%-55.29%-19.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EME and DRX.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.12

The correlation between EME and DRX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EME:

$37.11B

DRX.TO:

CA$169.54M

EPS

EME:

$29.65

DRX.TO:

CA$1.07

PE Ratio

EME:

27.79

DRX.TO:

9.59

PEG Ratio

EME:

0.65

DRX.TO:

0.18

PS Ratio

EME:

2.09

DRX.TO:

0.98

PB Ratio

EME:

9.60

DRX.TO:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

EME:

$17.75B

DRX.TO:

CA$258.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EME:

$3.47B

DRX.TO:

CA$59.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

EME:

$2.03B

DRX.TO:

CA$43.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EME vs. DRX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DRX.TO
DRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EME vs. DRX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEDRX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.50

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

2.89

+4.00

EME vs. DRX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the DRX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and DRX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEDRX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.77

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

0.69

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.22

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.17

+0.43

Drawdowns

EME vs. DRX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum DRX.TO drawdown of -94.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and DRX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEDRX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.56%

-94.08%

+23.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-34.27%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.19%

-75.11%

+38.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-75.11%

+38.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-84.01%

+36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.71%

-49.98%

+37.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-65.62%

+50.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

17.75%

-7.73%

Volatility

EME vs. DRX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is 7.08%, while ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO) has a volatility of 13.38%. This indicates that EME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEDRX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

13.38%

-6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.46%

40.86%

-15.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.11%

66.56%

-28.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.30%

58.98%

-25.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.97%

57.25%

-24.28%

Dividends

EME vs. DRX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than DRX.TO's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRX.TO
ADF Group Inc.
0.39%0.43%0.31%0.29%0.95%1.24%1.34%1.54%1.94%0.93%0.69%0.68%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.16%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%

Financials

EME vs. DRX.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and ADF Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.63B
78.79M
(EME) Total Revenue
(DRX.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EME values in USD, DRX.TO values in CAD

EME vs. DRX.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EMCOR Group, Inc. and ADF Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
18.7%
21.5%
Portfolio components
EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

DRX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.93M and revenue of 78.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

DRX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported an operating income of 9.02M and revenue of 78.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

DRX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported a net income of 6.36M and revenue of 78.79M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EME and DRX.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EME and DRX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer