EMA vs. LUG.TO
EMA (Emera Inc) and LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) are both stocks. EMA operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, EMA returned 20.76% vs 17.78% for LUG.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMA is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.87% return.
EMA
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- -27.87%
- 6M
- -24.20%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 76.39%
- 5Y*
- 49.60%
- 10Y*
- 31.76%
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 5.65% | 11.17% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -27.87% | 85.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA and LUG.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
EMA:
$15.54B
LUG.TO:
CA$19.02B
EMA:
$3.55
LUG.TO:
CA$3.77
EMA:
14.37
LUG.TO:
20.77
EMA:
0.46
LUG.TO:
0.28
EMA:
1.79
LUG.TO:
9.50
EMA:
1.69
LUG.TO:
13.96
EMA:
$8.59B
LUG.TO:
CA$2.00B
EMA:
$2.83B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.41B
EMA:
$2.56B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMA
LUG.TO
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMA | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 0.49 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 1.31 | +8.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.32 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.10 | +1.28 |
Drawdowns
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and LUG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -95.13% | +89.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -36.21% | +30.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -36.12% | +31.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -71.96% | +70.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 13.66% | -11.46% |
Volatility
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emera Inc (EMA) is 4.67%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that EMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMA | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 17.81% | -13.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 41.78% | -31.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 56.18% | -42.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 46.83% | -33.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 43.76% | -30.04% |
Dividends
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than LUG.TO's 5.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.87% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 5.30% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% |
Financials
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Inc and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMA vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 756.95M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 626.62M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 583.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMA and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMA and LUG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer