EKBAX vs. AIPO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EKBAX (Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both funds - EKBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EKBAX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.

Performance

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 29.15% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 42.13% return.

EKBAX

• 1D: -5.15%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 28.84%
• 1Y: 54.99%
• 3Y*: 29.78%
• 5Y*: 17.98%
• 10Y*: 15.83%

AIPO

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: 42.13%
• 6M: 32.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund	29.15%	11.55%
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	42.13%	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EKBAX and AIPO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

EKBAX vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKBAX

EKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 93
EKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
EKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EKBAX	AIPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EKBAX	AIPO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.89	-1.38

Drawdowns

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and AIPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EKBAX	AIPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.64%	-17.31%	-38.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.79%	-7.56%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-4.40%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EKBAX	AIPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.27%	34.68%	-17.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	34.68%	-16.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	34.68%	-17.03%

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EKBAX vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund	7.45%	9.61%	5.28%	6.16%	12.50%	6.89%	2.03%	9.49%	7.14%	6.20%	10.05%	11.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EKBAX and AIPO in my portfolio?

EKBAX and AIPO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.