PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGO vs. ES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EGO vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGO achieves a -16.52% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EGO has underperformed ES with an annualized return of 3.08%, while ES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.


EGO

1D
0.95%
1M
-12.34%
YTD
-16.52%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
41.91%
3Y*
45.33%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
3.08%

ES

1D
-3.56%
1M
3.59%
YTD
3.41%
6M
5.56%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGO vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EGO
Eldorado Gold Corporation
-16.52%141.56%14.65%55.14%-10.59%-29.54%65.26%178.82%-59.72%-55.28%
ES
Eversource Energy
3.41%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EGO and ES is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2003

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EGO:

$6.00B

ES:

$25.64B

EPS

EGO:

$2.83

ES:

$4.68

PE Ratio

EGO:

10.57

ES:

14.54

PEG Ratio

EGO:

0.16

ES:

0.82

PS Ratio

EGO:

3.03

ES:

1.83

PB Ratio

EGO:

1.39

ES:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

EGO:

$2.00B

ES:

$13.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EGO:

$988.83M

ES:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

EGO:

$1.04B

ES:

$4.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGO vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGO
EGO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGO vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGOESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.09

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.58

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

1.40

+0.96

EGO vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGO and ES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGOESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.36

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.01

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.23

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.28

-0.17

Drawdowns

EGO vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGO drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGO and ES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGOESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.49%

-73.04%

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.89%

-15.13%

-26.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.89%

-28.65%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.70%

-41.69%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.45%

-41.69%

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.44%

-14.08%

-57.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-19.07%

-36.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.77%

6.23%

+11.54%

Volatility

EGO vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.84%. This indicates that EGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGOESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.23%

7.84%

+9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.00%

15.94%

+27.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.63%

24.64%

+26.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.81%

23.94%

+21.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.33%

24.35%

+30.98%

Dividends

EGO vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

EGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ES's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGO
Eldorado Gold Corporation
0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.40%0.00%0.67%
ES
Eversource Energy
4.52%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%

Financials

EGO vs. ES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eldorado Gold Corporation and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
532.43M
4.50B
(EGO) Total Revenue
(ES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EGO and ES have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EGO has higher volatility (17.23%) compared to ES (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGO dropped -97.49% vs ES's -73.04%.

EGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGO and ES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer