PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than V3PA.DE's 31.55% return.


EGLN.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
2.32%
6M
3.98%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
11.21%

V3PA.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
5.87%
YTD
31.55%
6M
33.90%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.32%46.01%34.32%9.37%-0.98%
V3PA.DE
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
31.55%16.47%7.66%10.91%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EGLN.L and V3PA.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGLN.L
EGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

V3PA.DE
V3PA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGLN.LV3PA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

4.43

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

16.46

-12.29

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGLN.L and V3PA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGLN.LV3PA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.80

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.25

-0.88

Drawdowns

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than V3PA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and V3PA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGLN.LV3PA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.44%

-17.58%

-29.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.24%

-11.44%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-17.58%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.24%

-1.83%

-15.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-2.80%

-19.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

3.08%

+3.67%

Volatility

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 5.12%, while Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3PA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGLN.LV3PA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

6.33%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.24%

15.56%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

18.10%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

15.34%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

15.34%

+0.60%

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGLN.L vs. V3PA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGLN.L nor V3PA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EGLN.L and V3PA.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3PA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3PA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.

EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while V3PA.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.17% for V3PA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and V3PA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer