EGLN.L vs. ANET
EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ANET (Arista Networks, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EGLN.L returned 11.21%/yr vs 42.03%/yr for ANET. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while ANET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANET values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 21.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EGLN.L has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 11.21%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 42.03% annualized return.
EGLN.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
ANET
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- 21.56%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- 58.86%
- 3Y*
- 53.10%
- 5Y*
- 49.01%
- 10Y*
- 42.03%
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.32% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.59% | 3.38% | -0.47% |
ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 21.56% | 4.48% | 100.12% | 88.26% | -10.35% | 112.69% | 31.08% | -1.28% | -6.36% | 113.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and ANET is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGLN.L vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank
EGLN.L
ANET
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGLN.L | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.16 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 4.28 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGLN.L | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.05 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.86 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, smaller than the maximum ANET drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and ANET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGLN.L | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.44% | -52.91% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.24% | -27.45% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.24% | -52.91% | +35.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.24% | -52.91% | +35.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.21% | -52.91% | +26.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.24% | -10.67% | -6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -14.13% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 13.81% | -7.06% |
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 5.12%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 16.69%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGLN.L | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 16.69% | -11.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 39.61% | -19.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.28% | 52.84% | -29.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 47.10% | -29.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 45.30% | -29.36% |
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EGLN.L and ANET have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and ANET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer