PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than WPM.TO's -0.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFR.TO having a 20.86% annualized return and WPM.TO not far ahead at 20.97%.


EFR.TO

1D
2.07%
1M
-27.50%
YTD
6.74%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
183.69%
3Y*
35.82%
5Y*
20.83%
10Y*
20.86%

WPM.TO

1D
-1.07%
1M
-15.56%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
10.42%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
40.12%
5Y*
24.15%
10Y*
20.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFR.TO
Energy Fuels Inc.
6.74%169.01%-22.21%13.37%-13.25%78.89%117.74%-35.92%71.24%2.26%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-0.44%100.91%25.13%25.20%-1.07%3.20%39.06%47.18%-2.24%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EFR.TO and WPM.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.22

The correlation between EFR.TO and WPM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFR.TO:

CA$5.13B

WPM.TO:

CA$72.86B

EPS

EFR.TO:

-CA$0.30

WPM.TO:

CA$3.96

PS Ratio

EFR.TO:

58.41

WPM.TO:

26.54

PB Ratio

EFR.TO:

7.09

WPM.TO:

7.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFR.TO:

CA$84.86M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFR.TO:

CA$25.23M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFR.TO:

-CA$72.89M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFR.TO
EFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM.TO
WPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFR.TOWPM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.07

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

2.91

+4.30

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFR.TO and WPM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFR.TOWPM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.74

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.73

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.60

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.35

-0.43

Drawdowns

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than WPM.TO's maximum drawdown of -83.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and WPM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFR.TOWPM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-83.21%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.09%

-30.69%

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.28%

-30.69%

-28.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.59%

-39.04%

-25.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.32%

-47.50%

-30.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.07%

-29.12%

-62.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.37%

-25.70%

-65.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.59%

11.25%

+14.34%

Volatility

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.49% compared to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) at 17.73%. This indicates that EFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFR.TOWPM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.49%

17.73%

+9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.52%

37.89%

+27.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.27%

44.43%

+52.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.59%

33.33%

+38.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.73%

35.20%

+35.53%

Dividends

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Dividend Comparison

EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFR.TO
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.63%0.57%1.05%1.25%1.40%1.05%1.08%1.24%1.75%1.54%1.06%1.48%

Financials

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
35.84M
886.69M
(EFR.TO) Total Revenue
(WPM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

EFR.TO vs. WPM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Fuels Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.1%
77.5%
Portfolio components
EFR.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

WPM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

EFR.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.

WPM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

EFR.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.

WPM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFR.TO and WPM.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFR.TO and WPM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer