EFA vs. EUDI.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) and EUDI.L (SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while EUDI.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFA returned 9.28%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for EUDI.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EUDI.L.

Performance

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EFA is traded in USD, while EUDI.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUDI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than EUDI.L's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EFA has outperformed EUDI.L with an annualized return of 9.28%, while EUDI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.34% annualized return.

EFA

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 18.74%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

EUDI.L

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 3.95%
• 6M: 7.28%
• 1Y: 9.04%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	7.13%	31.55%	3.49%	18.36%	-14.39%	11.45%	7.60%	22.04%	-13.82%	25.07%
EUDI.L SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF	3.95%	35.87%	1.78%	21.57%	-16.03%	6.65%	-3.92%	19.06%	-12.14%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EFA and EUDI.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012	0.70

The correlation between EFA and EUDI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFA	EUDI.L
Financial Services	24.6%	23.1%
Industrials	19.9%	22.4%
Healthcare	10.6%	5.7%
Technology	10.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	7.9%
Basic Materials	5.9%	8.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	6.7%
Energy	4.0%	2.7%
Utilities	4.0%	19.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EFA vs. EUDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFA

EFA Risk / Return Rank: 38
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 41

EUDI.L

EUDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
EUDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EUDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
EUDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EUDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
EUDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFA	EUDI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.69	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	1.02	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.91	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	2.77	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the EUDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFA and EUDI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFA	EUDI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	0.69	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.40	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.42	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.41	-0.10

Drawdowns

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than EUDI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and EUDI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFA	EUDI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.04%	-38.34%	-22.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-9.87%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.05%	-13.97%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-37.62%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.19%	-38.34%	+4.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-4.55%	+1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-8.75%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.26%	-0.21%

Volatility

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (EUDI.L) at 3.03%. This indicates that EFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFA	EUDI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	3.03%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	10.33%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.31%	13.01%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	17.14%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.28%	17.43%	-0.15%

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than EUDI.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFA vs. EUDI.L - Dividend Comparison

EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than EUDI.L's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	3.16%	3.38%	3.24%	2.98%	2.69%	3.33%	2.13%	3.10%	3.39%	2.57%	3.07%	2.76%
EUDI.L SPDR® S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF	3.58%	4.08%	3.66%	3.31%	3.61%	2.80%	3.07%	3.12%	3.71%	3.15%	2.97%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFA and EUDI.L in my portfolio?

EFA and EUDI.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EFA or EUDI.L?

On fees, EUDI.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFA or EUDI.L?

EUDI.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.

What is the main difference between EFA and EUDI.L?

EFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EUDI.L is Europe Equities. EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while EUDI.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EFA and 0.30% for EUDI.L.