EEM vs. JEPQ
EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EEM returned 20.79%/yr vs 20.04%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
EEM vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.44% return.
EEM
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- 1Y
- 43.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEM vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 20.18% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -8.97% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEM and JEPQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EEM and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEM vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEM
JEPQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EEM
JEPQ
Financial Services
EEM
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
EEM
JEPQ
Industrials
EEM
JEPQ
Basic Materials
EEM
JEPQ
Communication Services
EEM
JEPQ
Energy
EEM
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
EEM
JEPQ
Healthcare
EEM
JEPQ
Utilities
EEM
JEPQ
Real Estate
EEM
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEM vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
EEM
JEPQ
EEM vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.95 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 14.33 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.13 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.96 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
EEM vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -20.07% | -46.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -8.82% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | -20.07% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -2.02% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -3.42% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 1.81% | +1.77% |
Volatility
EEM vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 3.65%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEM | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 3.65% | +6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.87% | 9.66% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 12.19% | +9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 16.67% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.67% | +3.95% |
EEM vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEM vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.85% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEM and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, EEM leads with 20.79% vs 20.04% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EEM has performed better with a 20.79% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.85% for EEM.
EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEM and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer