PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.44% return.


EEM

1D
1.80%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
20.18%
6M
22.10%
1Y
43.51%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
9.37%

JEPQ

1D
1.24%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.26%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.18%33.98%6.49%8.95%-8.97%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.44%15.18%24.85%36.28%-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and JEPQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022

0.64

The correlation between EEM and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEM vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
JEPQ

Technology

43.6%
54.0%

Financial Services

17.5%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
12.8%

Industrials

6.2%
3.1%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
15.4%

Energy

3.3%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
7.1%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.4%

Utilities

2.0%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.2%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
JEPQ
54.0%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
JEPQ
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
JEPQ
12.8%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
JEPQ
3.1%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
JEPQ
1.0%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
JEPQ
15.4%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
JEPQ
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
JEPQ
7.1%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
JEPQ
4.4%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
JEPQ
1.3%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
JEPQ
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.95

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

14.33

-2.13

EEM vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.13

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.96

-0.59

Drawdowns

EEM vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-20.07%

-46.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-8.82%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-20.07%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-2.02%

-5.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-3.42%

-12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

1.81%

+1.77%

Volatility

EEM vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 3.65%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

3.65%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.87%

9.66%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

12.19%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

16.67%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

16.67%

+3.95%

EEM vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.85%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.26%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, EEM leads with 20.79% vs 20.04% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EEM has performed better with a 20.79% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.85% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer