PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDU vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EDU vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDU achieves a -16.85% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -18.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EDU has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of 1.89%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.23% annualized return.


EDU

1D
-1.11%
1M
-14.64%
YTD
-16.85%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
-12.32%
10Y*
1.89%

BABA

1D
-0.82%
1M
-14.27%
YTD
-18.09%
6M
-24.07%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
-9.93%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDU vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
-16.85%-13.27%-11.55%110.45%65.81%-88.70%53.25%121.22%-41.69%124.46%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-18.09%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EDU and BABA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

0.43

The correlation between EDU and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EDU:

$7.22B

BABA:

$289.95B

EPS

EDU:

$2.63

BABA:

$33.90

PE Ratio

EDU:

17.17

BABA:

3.54

PEG Ratio

EDU:

2.67

BABA:

0.16

PS Ratio

EDU:

1.34

BABA:

0.36

PB Ratio

EDU:

1.77

BABA:

0.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

EDU:

$5.39B

BABA:

$811.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EDU:

$2.96B

BABA:

$332.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

EDU:

$716.97M

BABA:

$112.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDU vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDU
EDU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDU vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDUBABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.05

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

0.06

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

0.12

-0.22

EDU vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDU Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDU and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDUBABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.05

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.19

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.12

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.06

+0.16

Drawdowns

EDU vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDU drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDU and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDUBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.61%

-80.09%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.95%

-36.77%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.77%

-36.77%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.13%

-72.48%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.61%

-80.09%

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.24%

-60.13%

-16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.00%

-37.54%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.97%

19.02%

-7.05%

Volatility

EDU vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) is 8.16%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that EDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDUBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

13.26%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.28%

29.12%

-5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.49%

43.79%

-6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.46%

51.39%

+20.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.55%

43.40%

+16.15%

Dividends

EDU vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than BABA's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.67%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
2.65%1.09%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.46%0.00%1.28%

Financials

EDU vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.43B
35.15B
(EDU) Total Revenue
(BABA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EDU vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
53.7%
33.4%
Portfolio components
EDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 766.52M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

EDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported an operating income of 181.59M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

EDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. reported a net income of 127.71M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EDU and BABA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to EDU (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDU dropped -95.61% vs BABA's -80.09%.

BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDU and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer