EAT vs. LUG.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 13.68%/yr vs 31.76%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EAT is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 31.76% annualized return.

EAT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: -14.86%
• 3Y*: 59.52%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

LUG.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -15.65%
• YTD: -27.87%
• 6M: -24.20%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 76.39%
• 5Y*: 49.60%
• 10Y*: 31.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	1.83%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	-27.87%	309.94%	76.65%	32.70%	22.82%	-4.62%	34.40%	74.11%	1.61%	-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and LUG.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap EAT : $6.50B LUG.TO : CA$19.02B
EPS EAT : $10.14 LUG.TO : CA$3.77
PE Ratio EAT : 14.41 LUG.TO : 20.77
PEG Ratio EAT : 0.33 LUG.TO : 0.28
PS Ratio EAT : 1.16 LUG.TO : 9.50
PB Ratio EAT : 16.02 LUG.TO : 13.96
Total Revenue (TTM) EAT : $5.73B LUG.TO : CA$2.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) EAT : $3.45B LUG.TO : CA$1.41B
EBITDA (TTM) EAT : $807.20M LUG.TO : CA$1.43B

Return for Risk

EAT vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 29
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LUG.TO

LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAT	LUG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	0.32	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	0.79	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.10	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	0.49	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	1.31	-1.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and LUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAT	LUG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	0.32	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	1.07	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.73	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.10	+0.18

Drawdowns

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and LUG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAT	LUG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.40%	-95.13%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.41%	-36.21%	-8.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.92%	-36.21%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.54%	-43.37%	-22.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.94%	-46.50%	-38.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.73%	-36.12%	+13.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.34%	-71.96%	+47.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.68%	13.66%	+8.02%

Volatility

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 16.59%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAT	LUG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.59%	17.81%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.50%	41.78%	-6.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.55%	56.18%	-9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.95%	46.83%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.09%	43.76%	+11.33%

Dividends

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	5.30%	3.35%	2.69%	3.26%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

EAT vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brinker International, Inc. and Lundin Gold Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

LUG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

LUG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

LUG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAT and LUG.TO in my portfolio?

EAT and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.