PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAT vs. BBD-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EAT is traded in USD, while BBD-B.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BBD-B.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than BBD-B.TO's 27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed BBD-B.TO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while BBD-B.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.76% annualized return.


EAT

1D
4.04%
1M
5.38%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.69%
1Y
-14.86%
3Y*
59.52%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
13.68%

BBD-B.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.55%
YTD
27.23%
6M
29.41%
1Y
194.59%
3Y*
69.61%
5Y*
57.92%
10Y*
18.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
1.83%8.49%206.37%35.32%-12.79%-35.32%36.16%-0.92%17.27%-18.44%
BBD-B.TO
Bombardier Inc
27.23%150.30%69.37%4.28%17.04%250.17%-74.53%-0.84%-38.20%50.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and BBD-B.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EAT:

$6.50B

BBD-B.TO:

CA$30.41B

EPS

EAT:

$10.14

BBD-B.TO:

CA$9.32

PE Ratio

EAT:

14.41

BBD-B.TO:

32.46

PEG Ratio

EAT:

0.33

BBD-B.TO:

0.83

PS Ratio

EAT:

1.16

BBD-B.TO:

3.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

EAT:

$5.73B

BBD-B.TO:

CA$9.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EAT:

$3.45B

BBD-B.TO:

CA$1.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

EAT:

$807.20M

BBD-B.TO:

CA$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT
EAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BBD-B.TO
BBD-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BBD-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EATBBD-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.56

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

10.31

-10.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

30.51

-31.20

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the BBD-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and BBD-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EATBBD-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

3.80

-4.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.06

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.31

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.10

+0.18

Drawdowns

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, smaller than the maximum BBD-B.TO drawdown of -97.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and BBD-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATBBD-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.40%

-97.60%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.41%

-19.00%

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.92%

-41.54%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.54%

-67.54%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.94%

-94.91%

+9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.73%

-8.19%

-14.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-61.03%

+36.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.68%

6.41%

+15.27%

Volatility

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO) at 13.30%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBD-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATBBD-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

13.30%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.50%

39.50%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.55%

51.59%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.95%

55.19%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.09%

60.83%

-5.74%

Dividends

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAT nor BBD-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBD-B.TO
Bombardier Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%

Financials

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Bombardier Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.47B
1.57B
(EAT) Total Revenue
(BBD-B.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EAT values in USD, BBD-B.TO values in CAD

EAT vs. BBD-B.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brinker International, Inc. and Bombardier Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
74.6%
15.6%
Portfolio components
EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

BBD-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 245.90M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

BBD-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 175.08M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

BBD-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 52.13M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EAT and BBD-B.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAT and BBD-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer