PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DY vs. KBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DY vs. KBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and KBR, Inc. (KBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly higher than KBR's -12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has outperformed KBR with an annualized return of 18.40%, while KBR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


DY

1D
-1.59%
1M
7.13%
YTD
35.80%
6M
31.51%
1Y
88.82%
3Y*
61.44%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
18.40%

KBR

1D
-0.98%
1M
8.21%
YTD
-12.02%
6M
-18.59%
1Y
-33.30%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-1.20%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DY vs. KBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
35.80%94.13%51.24%22.96%-0.17%24.15%60.17%-12.75%-51.50%38.78%
KBR
KBR, Inc.
-12.02%-29.66%5.58%5.94%11.93%55.64%3.23%103.61%-22.05%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DY and KBR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between DY and KBR has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DY:

$13.94B

KBR:

$4.47B

EPS

DY:

$10.52

KBR:

$3.11

PE Ratio

DY:

43.60

KBR:

11.33

PEG Ratio

DY:

0.61

KBR:

0.07

PS Ratio

DY:

2.17

KBR:

0.59

PB Ratio

DY:

7.35

KBR:

2.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

DY:

$6.25B

KBR:

$7.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DY:

$1.23B

KBR:

$1.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

DY:

$1.07B

KBR:

$883.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DY vs. KBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DY
DY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KBR
KBR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DY vs. KBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and KBR, Inc. (KBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYKBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

-0.77

+4.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

-1.54

+13.89

DY vs. KBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DY Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the KBR Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DY and KBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYKBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

-1.06

+3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

-0.04

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.29

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.10

+0.15

Drawdowns

DY vs. KBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than KBR's maximum drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and KBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYKBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-77.47%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-43.18%

+18.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.58%

-57.39%

+24.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-57.39%

+23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.01%

-57.94%

-31.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.26%

-50.09%

+35.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-33.94%

-11.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

21.71%

-14.47%

Volatility

DY vs. KBR - Volatility Comparison

Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a higher volatility of 25.89% compared to KBR, Inc. (KBR) at 12.12%. This indicates that DY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYKBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.89%

12.12%

+13.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.22%

24.71%

+13.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

31.66%

+13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

28.59%

+14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.95%

36.83%

+16.12%

Dividends

DY vs. KBR - Dividend Comparison

DY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KBR
KBR, Inc.
1.87%1.64%1.04%0.97%0.91%0.92%1.29%1.05%2.11%1.61%1.92%1.89%

Financials

DY vs. KBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dycom Industries, Inc. and KBR, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.96B
1.92B
(DY) Total Revenue
(KBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DY vs. KBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dycom Industries, Inc. and KBR, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
14.0%
13.8%
Portfolio components
DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

KBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

KBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

KBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DY and KBR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DY has higher volatility (25.89%) compared to KBR (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs KBR's -77.47%.

DY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DY and KBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer