DY vs. FLR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) and FLR (Fluor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, DY returned 18.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for FLR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DY vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's 24.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 18.40%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower 0.33% annualized return.

DY

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: 35.80%
• 6M: 31.51%
• 1Y: 88.82%
• 3Y*: 61.44%
• 5Y*: 41.13%
• 10Y*: 18.40%

FLR

• 1D: 4.12%
• 1M: 14.34%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 11.46%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 19.94%
• 10Y*: 0.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DY vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DY Dycom Industries, Inc.	35.80%	94.13%	51.24%	22.96%	-0.17%	24.15%	60.17%	-12.75%	-51.50%	38.78%
FLR Fluor Corporation	24.96%	-19.65%	25.91%	13.01%	39.93%	55.10%	-14.55%	-39.54%	-36.61%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DY and FLR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000	0.45

Fundamentals

EPS DY : $10.52 FLR : $2.65
PE Ratio DY : 43.60 FLR : 18.68
PEG Ratio DY : 0.61 FLR : 0.04
PS Ratio DY : 2.17 FLR : 0.43
Total Revenue (TTM) DY : $6.25B FLR : $15.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) DY : $1.23B FLR : -$247.00M
EBITDA (TTM) DY : $1.07B FLR : -$276.00M

Return for Risk

DY vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DY

DY Risk / Return Rank: 88
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLR

FLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
FLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FLR Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FLR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DY vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DY	FLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	0.22	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	0.63	+2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.10	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	0.38	+3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.35	0.59	+11.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DY vs. FLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DY Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DY and FLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DY	FLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	0.22	+1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	0.44	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.01	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.13	+0.11

Drawdowns

DY vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and FLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DY	FLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-95.89%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.43%	-30.19%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.58%	-47.63%	+15.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-47.63%	+13.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.01%	-94.16%	+5.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.26%	-40.08%	+25.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-41.62%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.24%	19.45%	-12.21%

Volatility

DY vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a higher volatility of 25.89% compared to Fluor Corporation (FLR) at 21.30%. This indicates that DY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DY	FLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.89%	21.30%	+4.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.22%	34.11%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.58%	52.24%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.52%	45.18%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.95%	57.67%	-4.72%

Dividends

DY vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DY nor FLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DY Dycom Industries, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLR Fluor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.63%	3.87%	2.61%	1.63%	1.60%	1.78%

Financials

DY vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Fluor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DY and FLR in my portfolio?

DY and FLR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DY or FLR?

DY has higher volatility (25.89%) compared to FLR (21.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs FLR's -95.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.