PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVA vs. SEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DVA vs. SEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DaVita Inc. (DVA) and Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVA achieves a 69.07% return, which is significantly higher than SEM's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DVA has underperformed SEM with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SEM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


DVA

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
69.07%
6M
64.10%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
9.70%

SEM

1D
0.18%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.48%
6M
12.02%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVA vs. SEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVA
DaVita Inc.
69.07%-24.03%42.75%40.30%-34.36%-3.10%56.47%45.80%-28.78%12.54%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
12.48%-19.84%51.24%-3.52%-13.85%7.41%18.51%52.05%-13.03%33.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DVA and SEM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.40

The correlation between DVA and SEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DVA:

$13.07

SEM:

$1.44

PE Ratio

DVA:

14.70

SEM:

11.49

PS Ratio

DVA:

0.83

SEM:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

DVA:

$13.84B

SEM:

$5.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DVA:

$3.23B

SEM:

$588.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

DVA:

$2.49B

SEM:

$442.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVA vs. SEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVA
DVA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SEM
SEM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVA vs. SEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DaVita Inc. (DVA) and Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVASEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.39

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

0.98

+1.83

DVA vs. SEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the SEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVA and SEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVASEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.30

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

-0.10

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.26

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.22

+0.11

Drawdowns

DVA vs. SEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVA drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, which is greater than SEM's maximum drawdown of -60.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVA and SEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVASEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-60.26%

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.36%

-24.02%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.43%

-45.04%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.10%

-49.09%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-60.26%

+9.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-22.10%

+17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.07%

-22.66%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.02%

9.40%

+4.62%

Volatility

DVA vs. SEM - Volatility Comparison

DaVita Inc. (DVA) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) at 0.69%. This indicates that DVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVASEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

0.69%

+7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.95%

13.47%

+21.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.88%

31.38%

+11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.26%

37.44%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

42.30%

-7.57%

Dividends

DVA vs. SEM - Dividend Comparison

DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVA
DaVita Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
1.51%1.68%97.39%2.13%2.01%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.84%

Financials

DVA vs. SEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DaVita Inc. and Select Medical Holdings Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.42B
1.42B
(DVA) Total Revenue
(SEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DVA vs. SEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DaVita Inc. and Select Medical Holdings Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%202220232024202520260
12.3%
Portfolio components
DVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 175.47M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

DVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported an operating income of 481.89M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

SEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 98.42M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

DVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a net income of 197.53M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

SEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 44.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DVA and SEM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVA has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to SEM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVA dropped -92.91% vs SEM's -60.26%.

DVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVA and SEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer