PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVA vs. NHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DVA vs. NHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DaVita Inc. (DVA) and National HealthCare Corporation (NHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVA achieves a 69.07% return, which is significantly higher than NHC's 37.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DVA has underperformed NHC with an annualized return of 9.70%, while NHC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.


DVA

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
69.07%
6M
64.10%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
9.70%

NHC

1D
-2.29%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
37.48%
6M
43.22%
1Y
80.47%
3Y*
48.50%
5Y*
24.04%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVA vs. NHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVA
DaVita Inc.
69.07%-24.03%42.75%40.30%-34.36%-3.10%56.47%45.80%-28.78%12.54%
NHC
National HealthCare Corporation
37.48%30.34%19.05%60.84%-9.42%5.39%-20.66%13.02%32.43%-17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DVA and NHC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1995

0.22

The correlation between DVA and NHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DVA:

$13.07

NHC:

$7.89

PE Ratio

DVA:

14.70

NHC:

23.79

PEG Ratio

DVA:

2.29

NHC:

0.52

PS Ratio

DVA:

0.83

NHC:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

DVA:

$13.84B

NHC:

$1.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DVA:

$3.23B

NHC:

$558.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

DVA:

$2.49B

NHC:

$204.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVA vs. NHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVA
DVA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NHC
NHC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVA vs. NHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DaVita Inc. (DVA) and National HealthCare Corporation (NHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVANHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

6.16

-4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

16.45

-13.64

DVA vs. NHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the NHC Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVA and NHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVANHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.52

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.87

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.52

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.25

+0.08

Drawdowns

DVA vs. NHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVA drawdown since its inception was -92.91%, roughly equal to the maximum NHC drawdown of -96.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVA and NHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVANHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-96.33%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.36%

-13.13%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.43%

-33.40%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.10%

-33.40%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-35.27%

-15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-5.90%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.07%

-26.42%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.02%

4.92%

+9.10%

Volatility

DVA vs. NHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DaVita Inc. (DVA) is 8.03%, while National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that DVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVANHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

13.13%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.95%

25.60%

+9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.88%

32.13%

+10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.26%

27.74%

+9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

28.21%

+6.52%

Dividends

DVA vs. NHC - Dividend Comparison

DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVA
DaVita Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NHC
National HealthCare Corporation
1.36%1.85%2.25%2.53%3.80%3.11%3.13%2.38%2.52%3.10%2.31%3.14%

Financials

DVA vs. NHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DaVita Inc. and National HealthCare Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.42B
369.81M
(DVA) Total Revenue
(NHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DVA vs. NHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DaVita Inc. and National HealthCare Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
DVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported an operating income of 481.89M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

NHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported an operating income of 32.25M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

DVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a net income of 197.53M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

NHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a net income of 35.86M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DVA and NHC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHC has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to DVA (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVA dropped -92.91% vs NHC's -96.33%.

NHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVA and NHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer