DURPX vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DURPX (DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both funds - DURPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Over the past 5 years, DURPX returned 12.30%/yr vs 24.30%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURPX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DURPX is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 19.38% return.

DURPX

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 7.14%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 19.38%
• 6M: 17.34%
• 1Y: 47.19%
• 3Y*: 35.41%
• 5Y*: 24.30%
• 10Y*: 25.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio	7.14%	12.81%	20.49%	21.85%	-11.82%	25.27%	19.29%	33.11%	-5.11%	17.77%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	19.38%	24.49%	41.63%	59.85%	-29.07%	35.05%	42.15%	50.17%	-3.26%	17.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DURPX and XLKQ.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2017	0.54

The correlation between DURPX and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURPX

DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 35
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DURPX	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.36	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.11	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.39	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.79	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	8.47	+0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURPX and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DURPX	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.36	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.89	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.71	+0.14

Drawdowns

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DURPX	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.02%	-39.80%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-16.81%	+8.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-26.96%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-35.00%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-6.38%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.06%	-9.19%	+5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	5.56%	-3.52%

Volatility

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 3.29%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DURPX	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	7.63%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	15.32%	-6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	19.95%	-8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	27.22%	-11.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	23.87%	-6.28%

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DURPX vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio	0.99%	1.05%	1.20%	1.49%	3.65%	4.12%	1.34%	1.36%	1.69%	0.77%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DURPX and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

DURPX and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.