PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTLA.L achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than IBTA.L's 0.17% return.


DTLA.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
-6.50%
10Y*

IBTA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-1.94%4.49%-6.90%1.69%-30.29%-4.46%17.00%15.69%3.65%
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.17%5.34%4.07%4.21%-3.75%-0.64%3.14%3.62%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DTLA.L and IBTA.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

0.47

The correlation between DTLA.L and IBTA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTLA.LIBTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.60

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

4.90

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

16.98

-15.75

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTLA.L and IBTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTLA.LIBTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.10

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.84

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.98

-1.06

Drawdowns

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTLA.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -5.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLA.L and IBTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTLA.LIBTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.41%

-5.80%

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-0.67%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-0.89%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.80%

-5.70%

-37.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.04%

-0.34%

-40.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.04%

-0.97%

-23.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

0.19%

+2.75%

Volatility

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 0.54%. This indicates that DTLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTLA.LIBTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

0.54%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

1.12%

+5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

1.58%

+8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

2.16%

+12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

1.93%

+12.87%

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DTLA.L and IBTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DTLA.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DTLA.L nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DTLA.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L and IBTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTLA.L and IBTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer