PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRX.TO vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRX.TO is traded in CAD, while STRL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STRL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRX.TO achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 196.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DRX.TO has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 13.53%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 70.00% annualized return.


DRX.TO

1D
-3.47%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
11.96%
6M
35.50%
1Y
54.30%
3Y*
43.18%
5Y*
44.18%
10Y*
13.53%

STRL

1D
1.35%
1M
7.76%
YTD
196.55%
6M
176.92%
1Y
341.76%
3Y*
159.13%
5Y*
110.71%
10Y*
70.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRX.TO
ADF Group Inc.
11.96%-4.88%41.10%231.76%31.96%9.42%16.92%28.41%-51.53%-25.31%
STRL
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
196.55%73.49%107.79%161.70%32.62%41.25%29.04%23.96%-27.48%79.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DRX.TO and STRL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.08

The correlation between DRX.TO and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DRX.TO:

CA$169.54M

STRL:

$27.68B

EPS

DRX.TO:

CA$1.07

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

DRX.TO:

9.59

STRL:

79.71

PEG Ratio

DRX.TO:

0.18

STRL:

1.70

PS Ratio

DRX.TO:

0.98

STRL:

9.58

PB Ratio

DRX.TO:

0.92

STRL:

23.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRX.TO:

CA$258.74M

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRX.TO:

CA$59.38M

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

DRX.TO:

CA$43.53M

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRX.TO vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRX.TO
DRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRX.TOSTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

10.53

-8.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.25

29.67

-26.42

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRX.TO and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRX.TOSTRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

4.22

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.95

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

1.31

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.51

-0.30

Drawdowns

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, roughly equal to the maximum STRL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRX.TO and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRX.TOSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-91.60%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.86%

-32.70%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.49%

-48.62%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.49%

-48.62%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.12%

-55.77%

-26.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.31%

-9.92%

-39.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.70%

-43.76%

-17.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.75%

11.59%

+5.16%

Volatility

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ADF Group Inc. (DRX.TO) is 13.37%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 24.34%. This indicates that DRX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRX.TOSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.37%

24.34%

-10.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.87%

64.03%

-23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.17%

81.79%

-15.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.63%

57.23%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.73%

53.72%

+3.01%

Dividends

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

DRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRX.TO
ADF Group Inc.
0.39%0.43%0.31%0.29%0.95%1.24%1.34%1.54%1.94%0.93%0.69%0.68%
STRL
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADF Group Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
78.79M
825.68M
(DRX.TO) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DRX.TO values in CAD, STRL values in USD

DRX.TO vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ADF Group Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.5%
23.5%
Portfolio components
DRX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.93M and revenue of 78.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

DRX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported an operating income of 9.02M and revenue of 78.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

DRX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADF Group Inc. reported a net income of 6.36M and revenue of 78.79M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRX.TO and STRL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRX.TO and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer