PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. FGRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
8.48%
1M
14.62%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGRTX

1D
-2.11%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
8.13%
6M
9.72%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and FGRTX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAM

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAMFGRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

91.43

0.47

+90.96

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and FGRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMFGRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.97%

-56.17%

+36.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.18%

-2.45%

-10.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-8.72%

+6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMFGRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.85%

12.25%

+73.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.85%

16.73%

+69.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.85%

18.13%

+67.72%

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.60%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and FGRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer