DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO
DOL.TO (Dollarama Inc.) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. DOL.TO operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DOL.TO returned 20.00%/yr vs 44.44%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOL.TO achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 32.58% return. Over the past 10 years, DOL.TO has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 20.00%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 44.44% annualized return.
DOL.TO
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- -12.94%
- 6M
- -11.56%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.38%
- 5Y*
- 27.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.00%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 32.58%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 225.20%
- 3Y*
- 213.80%
- 5Y*
- 120.83%
- 10Y*
- 44.44%
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOL.TO Dollarama Inc. | -12.94% | 46.59% | 47.34% | 20.96% | 25.45% | 22.47% | 16.69% | 38.01% | -37.58% | 61.41% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 32.58% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOL.TO and CLS.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2009 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
DOL.TO:
CA$48.97B
CLS.TO:
CA$62.28B
DOL.TO:
CA$4.74
CLS.TO:
CA$8.28
DOL.TO:
37.63
CLS.TO:
64.97
DOL.TO:
1.75
CLS.TO:
0.87
DOL.TO:
6.79
CLS.TO:
4.52
DOL.TO:
33.63
CLS.TO:
29.68
DOL.TO:
CA$7.26B
CLS.TO:
CA$13.81B
DOL.TO:
CA$3.13B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.60B
DOL.TO:
CA$2.14B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DOL.TO
CLS.TO
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOL.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 7.15 | -7.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 17.88 | -17.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOL.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 3.17 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | 2.16 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.92 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.47 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOL.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -79.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL.TO and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOL.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.98% | -79.32% | +34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.07% | -31.71% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -54.25% | +35.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.07% | -54.25% | +35.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.98% | -79.32% | +34.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.38% | -17.55% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -28.86% | +22.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 12.66% | -4.15% |
Volatility
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) is 6.94%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 26.92%. This indicates that DOL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOL.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 26.92% | -19.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 54.95% | -36.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 71.57% | -48.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 56.52% | -35.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 48.79% | -24.56% |
Dividends
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
DOL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOL.TO Dollarama Inc. | 0.25% | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.39% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.19% | 1.31% |
Financials
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dollarama Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DOL.TO vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
DOL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a gross profit of 835.51M and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
DOL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported an operating income of 511.68M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
DOL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a net income of 392.46M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DOL.TO and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DOL.TO and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer