PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOCS vs. MPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DOCS vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCS achieves a -54.16% return, which is significantly lower than MPWR's 72.37% return.


DOCS

1D
-1.41%
1M
-21.86%
YTD
-54.16%
6M
-55.56%
1Y
-65.51%
3Y*
-13.78%
5Y*
10Y*

MPWR

1D
5.28%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
72.37%
6M
59.11%
1Y
128.65%
3Y*
47.03%
5Y*
36.56%
10Y*
37.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOCS vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
-54.16%-17.06%90.41%-16.45%-33.05%-5.42%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
72.37%54.45%-5.55%79.78%-27.78%37.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DOCS and MPWR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between DOCS and MPWR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DOCS:

$3.96B

MPWR:

$76.78B

EPS

DOCS:

$0.98

MPWR:

$13.89

PE Ratio

DOCS:

20.61

MPWR:

112.24

PEG Ratio

DOCS:

1.76

MPWR:

1.41

PS Ratio

DOCS:

6.27

MPWR:

25.63

PB Ratio

DOCS:

4.16

MPWR:

20.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

DOCS:

$644.86M

MPWR:

$2.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DOCS:

$574.54M

MPWR:

$1.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

DOCS:

$245.76M

MPWR:

$861.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOCS vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCS
DOCS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DOCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOCS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DOCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOCS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MPWR
MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCS vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOCSMPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.39

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

5.76

-6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

15.40

-16.88

DOCS vs. MPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCS Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the MPWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCS and MPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOCSMPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.21

2.70

-3.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.58

-0.84

Drawdowns

DOCS vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCS drawdown since its inception was -82.35%, which is greater than MPWR's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCS and MPWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOCSMPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.35%

-72.27%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.03%

-22.45%

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.34%

-51.65%

-26.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.10%

-7.73%

-72.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.16%

-17.72%

-39.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.55%

8.38%

+36.17%

Volatility

DOCS vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison

Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) has a higher volatility of 31.83% compared to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) at 19.38%. This indicates that DOCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOCSMPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.83%

19.38%

+12.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.10%

36.53%

+9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.27%

47.99%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.01%

53.40%

+15.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.01%

47.17%

+21.84%

Dividends

DOCS vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison

DOCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.43%0.69%0.85%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%

Financials

DOCS vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Doximity, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
145.37M
804.19M
(DOCS) Total Revenue
(MPWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DOCS vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Doximity, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
86.7%
55.3%
Portfolio components
DOCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported a gross profit of 125.97M and revenue of 145.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.7%.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

DOCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.83M and revenue of 145.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.

DOCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported a net income of 19.11M and revenue of 145.37M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DOCS and MPWR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOCS has higher volatility (31.83%) compared to MPWR (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCS dropped -82.35% vs MPWR's -72.27%.

MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOCS and MPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer