PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -0.79% return.


DIVO

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.66%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

NLR

1D
0.91%
1M
-12.54%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
31.16%
5Y*
20.16%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.28%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-0.79%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and NLR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.50

The correlation between DIVO and NLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVO vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVO
NLR

Financial Services

29.6%

-

Industrials

16.0%
15.1%

Technology

15.6%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.9%

-

Energy

6.7%
46.0%

Healthcare

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

1.9%
37.4%

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

DIVO
29.6%
NLR

-

Industrials

DIVO
16.0%
NLR
15.1%

Technology

DIVO
15.6%
NLR
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVO
11.5%
NLR

-

Consumer Defensive

DIVO
6.9%
NLR

-

Energy

DIVO
6.7%
NLR
46.0%

Healthcare

DIVO
6.6%
NLR

-

Basic Materials

DIVO
4.2%
NLR

-

Utilities

DIVO
1.9%
NLR
37.4%

Communication Services

DIVO
1.0%
NLR

-

Real Estate

DIVO

-

NLR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVONLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.04

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

2.08

+8.71

DIVO vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVONLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

0.63

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.69

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.16

+0.68

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVONLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-65.05%

+35.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-25.80%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-30.48%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-30.48%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-25.03%

+23.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-35.71%

+33.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

12.87%

-11.22%

Volatility

DIVO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVONLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

13.36%

-11.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

33.24%

-26.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

42.96%

-33.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

29.43%

-17.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

24.14%

-9.30%

DIVO vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIVO and NLR have an expense ratio of 0.56%.


Dividends

DIVO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than NLR's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.57%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and NLR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to DIVO (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 5-year performance, NLR leads with 20.16% vs 10.72% for DIVO. Both ETFs have the same 0.56% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NLR has performed better with a 20.16% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO and NLR have the same expense ratio: 0.56% per year.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 2.57% for NLR.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer