PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. MEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DIVO is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIVO having a 5.28% return and MEUD.L slightly lower at 5.24%.


DIVO

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.66%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

MEUD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.08%
YTD
5.24%
6M
8.76%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.28%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
5.24%36.05%1.93%19.47%-15.19%16.00%7.03%25.23%-14.71%26.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and MEUD.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.49

The correlation between DIVO and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVO
MEUD.L

Financial Services

29.6%
23.9%

Industrials

16.0%
20.3%

Technology

15.6%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
7.7%

Energy

6.7%
5.3%

Healthcare

6.6%
12.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.1%

Utilities

1.9%
4.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Financial Services

DIVO
29.6%
MEUD.L
23.9%

Industrials

DIVO
16.0%
MEUD.L
20.3%

Technology

DIVO
15.6%
MEUD.L
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVO
11.5%
MEUD.L
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

DIVO
6.9%
MEUD.L
7.7%

Energy

DIVO
6.7%
MEUD.L
5.3%

Healthcare

DIVO
6.6%
MEUD.L
12.6%

Basic Materials

DIVO
4.2%
MEUD.L
5.1%

Utilities

DIVO
1.9%
MEUD.L
4.4%

Communication Services

DIVO
1.0%
MEUD.L
3.0%

Real Estate

DIVO

-

MEUD.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVOMEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.46

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

5.19

+5.60

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVOMEUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.16

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.44

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.35

+0.50

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and MEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVOMEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-36.31%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-11.53%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-14.53%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-32.40%

+18.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-2.76%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-9.39%

+6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

3.25%

-1.60%

Volatility

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVOMEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

3.92%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

12.01%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

14.58%

-5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

19.16%

-7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

19.37%

-4.53%

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVO vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.15% for MEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and MEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer