DIVO vs. IAU
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. DIVO is actively managed, while IAU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVO returned 10.72%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for IAU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
DIVO vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 0.26% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
DIVO vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.28% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.26% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and IAU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.07 |
The correlation between DIVO and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIVO vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVO
IAU
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DIVO
IAU
-
Industrials
DIVO
IAU
-
Technology
DIVO
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIVO
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
DIVO
IAU
-
Energy
DIVO
IAU
-
Healthcare
DIVO
IAU
-
Basic Materials
DIVO
IAU
-
Utilities
DIVO
IAU
-
Communication Services
DIVO
IAU
-
Real Estate
DIVO
-
IAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
IAU
DIVO vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 1.52 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 3.80 | +6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.14 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.99 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.61 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -45.14% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | -20.04% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -20.04% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -20.93% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -19.88% | +18.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -15.97% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 7.99% | -6.34% |
Volatility
DIVO vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 5.64% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 23.33% | -16.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.09% | 26.68% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 18.02% | -6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 15.94% | -1.10% |
DIVO vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVO vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVO and IAU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to DIVO (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 5-year performance, IAU leads with 17.71% vs 10.72% for DIVO. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAU has performed better with a 17.71% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while IAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.25% for IAU.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVO and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer