DIVO vs. BINC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIVO returned 15.15%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for BINC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.

Performance

DIVO vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.61% return.

DIVO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 5.28%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 17.72%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.28%	17.40%	16.22%	7.56%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	0.61%	7.57%	5.76%	7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and BINC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023	0.39

DIVO vs. BINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVO	BINC
Financial Services	29.6%	0.1%
Industrials	16.0%	0.0%
Technology	15.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	-
Energy	6.7%	0.0%
Healthcare	6.6%	-0.0%
Basic Materials	4.2%	0.0%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-0.0%
Real Estate	-	-0.0%

Return for Risk

DIVO vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO

DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 66
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 71
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIVO	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.43	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.52	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.48	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	2.06	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.79	8.08	+2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIVO vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIVO	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.43	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	2.32	-1.48

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVO	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.04%	-2.69%	-27.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-2.69%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.12%	-2.69%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.77%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-0.36%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	0.68%	+0.97%

Volatility

DIVO vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.70%. This indicates that DIVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVO	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	0.70%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.02%	1.85%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.09%	2.28%	+6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.95%	3.00%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.84%	3.00%	+11.84%

DIVO vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVO vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than BINC's 5.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.88%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	6.43%	6.44%	4.70%	4.67%	4.76%	4.79%	4.91%	8.16%	5.27%	3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVO and BINC in my portfolio?

DIVO and BINC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVO or BINC?

DIVO has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to BINC (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs BINC's -2.69%.

Which ETF is better, DIVO or BINC?

On 3-year performance, DIVO leads with 15.15% vs 6.84% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVO or BINC?

Over the 3-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVO or BINC?

BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVO or BINC?

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 5.88% for BINC.

What is the main difference between DIVO and BINC?

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.40% for BINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.