DIV vs. ET
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.02%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ET. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIV vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 21.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 4.02%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
DIV vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 12.28% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and ET is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and ET has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
ET
DIV vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIV | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.62 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 3.55 | +4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIV | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.01 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.87 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DIV vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -87.81% | +35.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -10.02% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -24.56% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -25.82% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -72.82% | +20.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -5.15% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -25.74% | +18.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 4.57% | -2.70% |
Volatility
DIV vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.19%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 5.27% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 11.84% | -4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 16.12% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 24.87% | -11.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 35.02% | -17.03% |
Dividends
DIV vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, less than ET's 6.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.74% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and ET have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ET has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DIV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs ET's -87.81%.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer