PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHR vs. SU.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHR vs. SU.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DHR is traded in USD, while SU.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SU.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -19.66% return, which is significantly lower than SU.PA's 14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has underperformed SU.PA with an annualized return of 11.19%, while SU.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.


DHR

1D
-0.42%
1M
7.23%
YTD
-19.66%
6M
-17.95%
1Y
-5.73%
3Y*
-3.67%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
11.19%

SU.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
14.83%
6M
14.58%
1Y
22.16%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
20.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHR vs. SU.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHR
Danaher Corporation
-19.66%0.35%-0.35%-1.22%-19.02%48.57%45.34%49.55%11.80%20.01%
SU.PA
Schneider Electric S.E.
14.83%12.59%26.19%46.36%-27.10%38.52%45.34%54.98%-17.23%25.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DHR and SU.PA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2007

0.35

The correlation between DHR and SU.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHR vs. SU.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHR
DHR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SU.PA
SU.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SU.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SU.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SU.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SU.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SU.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHR vs. SU.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHRSU.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.14

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.13

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

3.01

-3.43

DHR vs. SU.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHR Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the SU.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHR and SU.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHRSU.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

0.70

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.52

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.40

+0.25

Drawdowns

DHR vs. SU.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum SU.PA drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and SU.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHRSU.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.80%

-62.83%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.97%

-20.24%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.72%

-28.35%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

-44.80%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.81%

-44.80%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.31%

-6.60%

-29.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-13.76%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.51%

7.62%

+5.89%

Volatility

DHR vs. SU.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaher Corporation (DHR) is 9.24%, while Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that DHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SU.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHRSU.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

11.01%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.43%

25.76%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

32.77%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.00%

31.46%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

29.22%

-3.69%

Dividends

DHR vs. SU.PA - Dividend Comparison

DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SU.PA's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.74%0.56%0.47%12.64%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%32.55%0.58%
SU.PA
Schneider Electric S.E.
1.55%1.66%1.45%1.73%2.22%1.51%2.16%2.57%3.68%2.88%3.03%2.59%

Financials

DHR vs. SU.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaher Corporation and Schneider Electric S.E.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. DHR values in USD, SU.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


DHR and SU.PA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHR and SU.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer