PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHR vs. ROL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHR vs. ROL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -19.66% return, which is significantly higher than ROL's -21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has underperformed ROL with an annualized return of 11.19%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


DHR

1D
-0.42%
1M
7.23%
YTD
-19.66%
6M
-17.95%
1Y
-5.73%
3Y*
-3.67%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
11.19%

ROL

1D
-1.10%
1M
-13.17%
YTD
-21.89%
6M
-22.56%
1Y
-18.37%
3Y*
5.88%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
15.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHR vs. ROL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHR
Danaher Corporation
-19.66%0.35%-0.35%-1.22%-19.02%48.57%45.34%49.55%11.80%20.01%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
-21.89%31.06%7.56%21.19%8.10%-11.43%78.47%-6.95%17.61%39.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DHR and ROL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.32

The correlation between DHR and ROL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHR:

$130.53B

ROL:

$22.42B

EPS

DHR:

$5.17

ROL:

$1.10

PE Ratio

DHR:

35.51

ROL:

42.54

PS Ratio

DHR:

5.29

ROL:

5.86

PB Ratio

DHR:

2.47

ROL:

16.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHR:

$24.78B

ROL:

$3.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHR:

$15.04B

ROL:

$1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

DHR:

$6.69B

ROL:

$859.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHR vs. ROL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHR
DHR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ROL
ROL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHR vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHRROLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.87

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.60

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

-1.85

+1.42

DHR vs. ROL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHR Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the ROL Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHR and ROL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHRROLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

-0.77

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.35

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.50

+0.14

Drawdowns

DHR vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum ROL drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and ROL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHRROLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.80%

-57.27%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.97%

-30.90%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.72%

-30.90%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

-30.90%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.81%

-30.90%

-12.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.31%

-28.54%

-7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-12.13%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.51%

9.97%

+3.54%

Volatility

DHR vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison

Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Rollins, Inc. (ROL) at 8.75%. This indicates that DHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHRROLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

8.75%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.43%

19.11%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

24.09%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.00%

24.57%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

25.04%

+0.49%

Dividends

DHR vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison

DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than ROL's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.74%0.56%0.47%12.64%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%32.55%0.58%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.53%1.13%1.33%1.24%1.18%1.23%0.84%1.42%1.03%1.20%1.18%1.62%

Financials

DHR vs. ROL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaher Corporation and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
5.95B
906.42M
(DHR) Total Revenue
(ROL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DHR vs. ROL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaher Corporation and Rollins, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
60.3%
0
Portfolio components
DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHR and ROL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHR has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to ROL (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHR dropped -45.80% vs ROL's -57.27%.

DHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHR and ROL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer