PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. MLPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD.L's 18.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed MLPD.L with an annualized return of 13.26%, while MLPD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.11% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.67%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.27%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.26%

MLPD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
14.62%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.47%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
18.82%2.34%22.53%19.70%31.82%36.90%-31.38%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and MLPD.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.28

The correlation between DGRO and MLPD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
MLPD.L

Financial Services

21.2%

-

Technology

19.4%

-

Healthcare

16.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.5%

-

Industrials

10.8%
0.2%

Utilities

6.9%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Energy

5.6%
96.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

DGRO
21.2%
MLPD.L

-

Technology

DGRO
19.4%
MLPD.L

-

Healthcare

DGRO
16.4%
MLPD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.5%
MLPD.L

-

Industrials

DGRO
10.8%
MLPD.L
0.2%

Utilities

DGRO
6.9%
MLPD.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.7%
MLPD.L

-

Energy

DGRO
5.6%
MLPD.L
96.7%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
MLPD.L

-

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
MLPD.L

-

Real Estate

DGRO

-

MLPD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. MLPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROMLPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.83

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

4.68

+8.44

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and MLPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROMLPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.09

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.13

+0.64

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and MLPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROMLPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-82.22%

+47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.48%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-17.24%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-21.78%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-75.74%

+40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.16%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-28.08%

+24.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.33%

-1.66%

Volatility

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROMLPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

4.46%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

10.93%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

14.24%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

20.36%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

28.33%

-11.70%

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRO vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than MLPD.L's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.56%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and MLPD.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MLPD.L is Energy Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.50% for MLPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and MLPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer