DGRO vs. L100.L
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while L100.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.26%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for L100.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for L100.L.
Performance
DGRO vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DGRO is traded in USD, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than L100.L's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed L100.L with an annualized return of 13.26%, while L100.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
DGRO vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.47% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 5.25% | 35.31% | 7.47% | 13.03% | -6.35% | 16.85% | -9.09% | 22.11% | -14.28% | 22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and L100.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.49 |
The correlation between DGRO and L100.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRO vs. L100.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
L100.L
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
L100.L
Technology
DGRO
L100.L
Healthcare
DGRO
L100.L
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
L100.L
Industrials
DGRO
L100.L
Utilities
DGRO
L100.L
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
L100.L
Energy
DGRO
L100.L
Basic Materials
DGRO
L100.L
Communication Services
DGRO
L100.L
Real Estate
DGRO
-
L100.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
L100.L
DGRO vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.98 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 6.66 | +6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.44 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.47 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.18 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum L100.L drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and L100.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -60.70% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.73% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -13.73% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -26.01% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -42.27% | +7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -4.83% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -14.16% | +10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.90% | -1.23% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 3.86% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 11.26% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 13.41% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 16.56% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.32% | -1.69% |
DGRO vs. L100.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than L100.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DGRO vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and L100.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for L100.L.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while L100.L is Europe Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.14% for L100.L.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and L100.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer