DGRO vs. FWRA.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DGRO returned 21.90% vs 25.89% for FWRA.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.

Performance

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 9.27% return.

DGRO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 6M: 9.27%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 13.26%

FWRA.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.47%	15.69%	16.62%	8.20%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	9.27%	22.42%	18.04%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and FWRA.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.42

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGRO	FWRA.L
Financial Services	21.2%	16.4%
Technology	19.4%	29.1%
Healthcare	16.4%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	11.5%	5.0%
Industrials	10.8%	11.0%
Utilities	6.9%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	9.4%
Energy	5.6%	4.3%
Basic Materials	2.5%	3.9%
Communication Services	0.1%	8.9%
Real Estate	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

DGRO vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 78
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGRO	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.07	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.08	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	2.95	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.12	12.33	+0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGRO	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.07	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.51	-0.75

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FWRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRO	FWRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.10%	-16.50%	-18.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-8.78%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-2.75%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-1.92%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	2.10%	-0.43%

Volatility

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRO	FWRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	3.90%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	9.98%	-3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.52%	12.55%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.82%	13.63%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	13.63%	+3.00%

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DGRO vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRO and FWRA.L in my portfolio?

DGRO and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRO or FWRA.L?

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRO or FWRA.L?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.

What is the main difference between DGRO and FWRA.L?

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.15% for FWRA.L.