DGRO vs. FANG
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.26%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FANG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DGRO vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 33.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 13.26%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
FANG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 33.36%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 22.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
DGRO vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.47% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 33.36% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and FANG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and FANG has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
FANG
DGRO vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.58 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 7.07 | +6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.43 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.60 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.23 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.47 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -88.72% | +53.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -12.53% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -42.10% | +28.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -42.10% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -88.72% | +53.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -6.74% | +5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -19.39% | +15.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 6.33% | -4.66% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 11.35% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 23.88% | -16.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 31.51% | -21.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 37.98% | -24.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 49.06% | -32.43% |
Dividends
DGRO vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FANG's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.09% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and FANG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to DGRO (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs FANG's -88.72%.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer