DGP vs. VDC
DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGP returned 19.21%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for VDC. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
DGP vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DGP has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 19.21%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.
DGP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -16.73%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 52.74%
- 3Y*
- 53.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.00%
- 10Y*
- 19.21%
VDC
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
DGP vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | -4.85% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 7.19% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGP and VDC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGP vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
DGP
VDC
DGP vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGP | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.44 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 0.90 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGP | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.33 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.51 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.52 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
DGP vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGP | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -34.24% | -41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -9.28% | -27.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.98% | -11.78% | -25.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.24% | -16.55% | -34.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.24% | -25.31% | -25.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -7.27% | -29.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -3.73% | -37.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | 4.53% | +10.22% |
Volatility
DGP vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.47%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGP | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 4.47% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.99% | 9.87% | +37.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 12.43% | +40.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.91% | 13.15% | +25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.11% | 14.65% | +20.46% |
DGP vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGP vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.14% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGP and VDC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGP has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to VDC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, DGP leads with 19.21% vs 7.63% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGP has performed better with a 19.21% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DGP.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.
DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 0.09% for VDC.
DGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGP and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer