PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFS vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DFS vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Discover Financial Services (DFS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PG

1D
-0.98%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.43%
1Y
-8.99%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFS vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%15.88%57.32%18.20%-13.55%29.78%10.13%46.94%-21.80%8.92%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.74%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DFS and PG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.27

The correlation between DFS and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

DFS:

$10.25B

PG:

$86.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DFS:

$7.81B

PG:

$43.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

DFS:

$4.40B

PG:

$22.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFS vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFS

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Discover Financial Services (DFS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFS vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

DFS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.93%

Volatility

DFS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

Dividends

DFS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

DFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%0.35%1.62%2.40%2.35%1.63%1.94%1.98%2.54%1.69%1.61%2.01%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.94%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

DFS vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Discover Financial Services and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
5.49B
21.24B
(DFS) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DFS and PG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFS and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer