DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE
DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEN.DE returned 37.67%/yr vs 60.34%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 60.30% return.
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 10.60%
- 3Y*
- 37.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 60.30%
- 6M
- 57.83%
- 1Y
- 123.73%
- 3Y*
- 60.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 1.84% | 50.76% | 51.97% | 22.65% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 60.30% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 36.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN.DE
LSMC.DE
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEN.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.55 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 9.41 | -8.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | 30.19 | -28.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEN.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 3.91 | -3.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.84 | 1.11 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -39.64% | +21.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.60% | -12.84% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | -36.22% | +17.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.99% | -5.42% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -11.44% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 4.01% | +3.92% |
Volatility
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) is 7.01%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that DFEN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 12.15% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.21% | 22.95% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 30.90% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 32.26% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 32.26% | -11.06% |
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFEN.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for DFEN.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer