PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEN.DE vs. IBDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFEN.DE is traded in EUR, while IBDU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBDU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than IBDU's 2.26% return.


DFEN.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
1.84%
6M
3.89%
1Y
10.60%
3Y*
37.67%
5Y*
10Y*

IBDU

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.95%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFEN.DE
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A
1.84%50.76%51.97%22.65%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
2.26%-5.17%10.46%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEN.DE and IBDU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEN.DE
DFEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IBDU
IBDU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IBDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFEN.DEIBDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.12

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

1.05

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

2.95

-1.49

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the IBDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEN.DE and IBDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFEN.DEIBDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

0.67

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

0.19

+1.65

Drawdowns

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, which is greater than IBDU's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and IBDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEN.DEIBDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.60%

-15.73%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.60%

-3.54%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-10.07%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.99%

-4.63%

-12.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-4.57%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.93%

1.26%

+6.67%

Volatility

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) at 0.94%. This indicates that DFEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEN.DEIBDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

0.94%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

3.92%

+15.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.92%

5.58%

+19.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

7.87%

+13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

8.89%

+12.31%

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDU's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEN.DE vs. IBDU - Dividend Comparison

DFEN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DFEN.DE
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
4.67%4.67%4.75%4.21%3.34%2.29%2.42%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEN.DE and IBDU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBDU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBDU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.

DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IBDU is Corporate Bonds. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.10% for IBDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEN.DE and IBDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer