DFCF vs. TRRCX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DFCF (Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF) and TRRCX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund) are both funds - DFCF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional, while TRRCX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 3 years, DFCF returned 4.72%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for TRRCX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFCF charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TRRCX.

Performance

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than TRRCX's 5.66% return.

DFCF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRRCX

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 9.16%
• 3Y*: 11.10%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 8.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFCF Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF	-0.06%	7.89%	1.86%	6.94%	-14.48%	0.23%
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	5.66%	8.23%	10.73%	16.36%	-16.89%	-1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCF and TRRCX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.38

The correlation between DFCF and TRRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFCF vs. TRRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCF

DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 44
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 41

TRRCX

TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 15
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFCF	TRRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.00	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.32	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.21	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.23	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	4.08	+1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the TRRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCF and TRRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFCF	TRRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.00	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.57	-0.55

Drawdowns

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum TRRCX drawdown of -52.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and TRRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFCF	TRRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-52.28%	+32.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-7.93%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.05%	-10.46%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-2.10%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-6.07%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.36%	-1.43%

Volatility

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) is 1.34%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that DFCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFCF	TRRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	2.97%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	8.52%	-5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.94%	9.77%	-5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.46%	11.37%	-4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.46%	12.25%	-5.79%

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRCX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFCF vs. TRRCX - Dividend Comparison

DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, while TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFCF Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF	4.33%	4.48%	4.61%	4.51%	3.27%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.38%	6.16%	12.05%	9.43%	5.45%	5.44%	8.83%	3.82%	2.66%	3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFCF and TRRCX in my portfolio?

DFCF and TRRCX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFCF or TRRCX?

TRRCX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DFCF (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCF dropped -19.56% vs TRRCX's -52.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.