DECK vs. ENEL.MI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) and ENEL.MI (Enel SpA) are both stocks. DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while ENEL.MI operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, DECK returned 28.25%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for ENEL.MI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DECK is traded in USD, while ENEL.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENEL.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than ENEL.MI's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed ENEL.MI with an annualized return of 28.25%, while ENEL.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.43% annualized return.

DECK

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 9.27%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 0.47%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: 15.25%
• 10Y*: 28.25%

ENEL.MI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.76%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 15.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation	5.85%	-48.95%	82.30%	67.46%	8.97%	27.73%	69.83%	31.97%	59.44%	44.88%
ENEL.MI Enel SpA	8.44%	54.38%	2.16%	47.14%	-27.94%	-18.12%	33.94%	44.24%	-1.88%	45.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DECK and ENEL.MI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2007	0.17

The correlation between DECK and ENEL.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DECK vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECK

DECK Risk / Return Rank: 41
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ENEL.MI

ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 82
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DECK	ENEL.MI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	1.38	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	1.91	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.26	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.01	2.31	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.03	6.53	-6.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECK Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECK and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DECK	ENEL.MI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	1.38	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.37	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.62	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.25	-0.01

Drawdowns

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than ENEL.MI's maximum drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and ENEL.MI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECK	ENEL.MI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.36%	-62.43%	-31.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.81%	-12.54%	-23.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.35%	-16.58%	-47.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.35%	-56.89%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.35%	-60.65%	-3.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.82%	-8.35%	-42.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-20.96%	-19.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.94%	4.43%	+12.51%

Volatility

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 5.73%. This indicates that DECK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECK	ENEL.MI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.51%	5.73%	+5.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.06%	18.51%	+12.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.42%	20.92%	+24.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.98%	23.87%	+20.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.47%	24.69%	+17.78%

Dividends

DECK vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENEL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ENEL.MI Enel SpA	5.00%	4.98%	5.44%	5.56%	7.55%	5.08%	3.96%	3.96%	4.70%	3.51%	3.82%	3.60%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECK and ENEL.MI in my portfolio?

DECK and ENEL.MI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.