PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECK vs. BDT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DECK is traded in USD, while BDT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BDT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than BDT.TO's 108.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed BDT.TO with an annualized return of 28.25%, while BDT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.28% annualized return.


DECK

1D
1.48%
1M
9.27%
YTD
5.85%
6M
8.42%
1Y
0.47%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
28.25%

BDT.TO

1D
-0.97%
1M
9.96%
YTD
108.38%
6M
117.99%
1Y
119.78%
3Y*
95.26%
5Y*
45.62%
10Y*
20.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
5.85%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
108.38%18.52%71.18%89.77%-18.12%28.11%22.11%29.91%-41.45%25.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DECK and BDT.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.19

The correlation between DECK and BDT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DECK:

$15.53B

BDT.TO:

CA$3.32B

EPS

DECK:

$6.98

BDT.TO:

CA$0.89

PE Ratio

DECK:

15.72

BDT.TO:

67.21

PEG Ratio

DECK:

0.57

BDT.TO:

6.06

PS Ratio

DECK:

2.94

BDT.TO:

0.96

PB Ratio

DECK:

6.21

BDT.TO:

7.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

DECK:

$5.47B

BDT.TO:

CA$3.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DECK:

$3.16B

BDT.TO:

CA$334.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

DECK:

$1.31B

BDT.TO:

CA$190.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECK vs. BDT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BDT.TO
BDT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECKBDT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.52

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

4.75

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

14.65

-14.62

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECK Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECK and BDT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECKBDT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.96

-2.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

1.30

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.59

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.60

-0.36

Drawdowns

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than BDT.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and BDT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECKBDT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-74.67%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.81%

-25.38%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.35%

-44.76%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.35%

-48.16%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.35%

-67.08%

+2.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.82%

-6.86%

-43.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-23.64%

-16.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.94%

8.21%

+8.73%

Volatility

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is 11.51%, while Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a volatility of 18.17%. This indicates that DECK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECKBDT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.51%

18.17%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.06%

27.71%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.42%

40.81%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.98%

35.31%

+8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.47%

34.71%

+7.76%

Dividends

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Dividend Comparison

DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
1.40%2.95%2.25%2.94%4.85%3.97%4.89%5.45%6.38%3.85%8.38%5.84%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Bird Construction Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.12B
783.37M
(DECK) Total Revenue
(BDT.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DECK values in USD, BDT.TO values in CAD

DECK vs. BDT.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Bird Construction Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.6%
7.7%
Portfolio components
DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

BDT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

BDT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

BDT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DECK and BDT.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECK and BDT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer