DDOG vs. TTD
DDOG (Datadog, Inc.) and TTD (The Trade Desk, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, DDOG returned 20.36%/yr vs -19.79%/yr for TTD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DDOG vs. TTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDOG achieves a 70.37% return, which is significantly higher than TTD's -48.81% return.
DDOG
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 15.75%
- YTD
- 70.37%
- 6M
- 50.17%
- 1Y
- 89.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.36%
- 10Y*
- —
TTD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -15.81%
- YTD
- -48.81%
- 6M
- -50.62%
- 1Y
- -72.81%
- 3Y*
- -36.13%
- 5Y*
- -19.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DDOG vs. TTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 70.37% | -4.83% | 17.72% | 65.14% | -58.73% | 80.93% | 160.56% | -6.37% |
TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | -48.81% | -67.70% | 63.33% | 60.52% | -51.08% | 14.41% | 208.34% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOG and TTD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DDOG and TTD has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DDOG:
$84.50B
TTD:
$9.27B
DDOG:
$0.37
TTD:
$0.89
DDOG:
620.53
TTD:
21.88
DDOG:
5.56
TTD:
0.29
DDOG:
22.93
TTD:
3.19
DDOG:
21.19
TTD:
3.78
DDOG:
$3.67B
TTD:
$2.97B
DDOG:
$2.93B
TTD:
$2.31B
DDOG:
$173.48M
TTD:
$725.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDOG vs. TTD — Risk / Return Rank
DDOG
TTD
DDOG vs. TTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOG | TTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.71 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.93 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | -1.30 | +4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOG | TTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | -1.14 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.30 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.31 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
DDOG vs. TTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDOG drawdown since its inception was -68.11%, smaller than the maximum TTD drawdown of -86.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOG and TTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOG | TTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.11% | -86.07% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.62% | -78.35% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.62% | -86.07% | +37.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.11% | -86.07% | +17.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.51% | -86.07% | +69.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.87% | -27.19% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.77% | 55.98% | -31.21% |
Volatility
DDOG vs. TTD - Volatility Comparison
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) have volatilities of 19.53% and 19.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDOG | TTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.53% | 19.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.44% | 41.01% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.67% | 64.21% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.25% | 67.36% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.06% | 68.47% | -8.41% |
Dividends
DDOG vs. TTD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDOG nor TTD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DDOG vs. TTD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Datadog, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DDOG vs. TTD - Profitability Comparison
DDOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a gross profit of 797.20M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.2%.
TTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 506.89M and revenue of 688.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.
DDOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
TTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.65M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.
DDOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a net income of 52.57M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
TTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDOG and TTD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTD has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to DDOG (19.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDOG dropped -68.11% vs TTD's -86.07%.
DDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDOG and TTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer