PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. SCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 12.28%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


DBEF

1D
0.82%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.28%

SCZ

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
7.96%
6M
10.42%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
7.96%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and SCZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.77

The correlation between DBEF and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
SCZ

Financial Services

24.6%
12.5%

Industrials

19.9%
24.6%

Healthcare

10.5%
5.5%

Technology

10.3%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%
10.7%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.1%

Energy

4.1%
3.7%

Utilities

3.9%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.3%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.6%
SCZ
12.5%

Industrials

DBEF
19.9%
SCZ
24.6%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.5%
SCZ
5.5%

Technology

DBEF
10.3%
SCZ
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.5%
SCZ
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.8%
SCZ
5.0%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.9%
SCZ
10.7%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.5%
SCZ
4.1%

Energy

DBEF
4.1%
SCZ
3.7%

Utilities

DBEF
3.9%
SCZ
2.8%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.9%
SCZ
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEFSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.89

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

7.18

+3.06

DBEF vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEFSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.47

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.28

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.47

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.26

+0.28

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and SCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-61.86%

+29.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-11.43%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-15.06%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-36.87%

+21.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-41.07%

+8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-3.23%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-13.06%

+8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.00%

-0.76%

Volatility

DBEF vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.60%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.69%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

12.26%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

14.71%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

16.78%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

17.45%

-1.64%

DBEF vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than SCZ's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.07%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.05%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and SCZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.28% vs 8.12% for SCZ. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 3.05% for SCZ.

DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.40% for SCZ.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and SCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer