DBEF vs. SCZ
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.28%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for SCZ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
DBEF vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 12.28%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
DBEF vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 9.52% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 7.96% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and SCZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DBEF and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
SCZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
SCZ
Industrials
DBEF
SCZ
Healthcare
DBEF
SCZ
Technology
DBEF
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
SCZ
Basic Materials
DBEF
SCZ
Communication Services
DBEF
SCZ
Energy
DBEF
SCZ
Utilities
DBEF
SCZ
Real Estate
DBEF
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
SCZ
DBEF vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBEF | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.89 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 7.18 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBEF | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.47 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.28 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.47 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.26 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -61.86% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -11.43% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -15.06% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -36.87% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -41.07% | +8.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -3.23% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -13.06% | +8.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.00% | -0.76% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.60%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 4.69% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 12.26% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 14.71% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 16.78% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 17.45% | -1.64% |
DBEF vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than SCZ's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.07% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.05% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and SCZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.28% vs 8.12% for SCZ. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 3.05% for SCZ.
DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.40% for SCZ.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer