DBEF vs. IWB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.28%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for IWB. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IWB.

Performance

DBEF vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 12.28%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.

DBEF

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

IWB

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 8.45%
• 1Y: 23.94%
• 3Y*: 21.07%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	9.52%	23.16%	13.40%	20.15%	-5.13%	19.60%	2.03%	24.94%	-9.52%	16.74%
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	8.46%	17.18%	24.32%	26.39%	-19.19%	26.32%	20.77%	31.06%	-4.90%	21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and IWB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011	0.75

The correlation between DBEF and IWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. IWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEF	IWB
Financial Services	24.6%	11.3%
Industrials	19.9%	8.6%
Healthcare	10.5%	8.6%
Technology	10.3%	36.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	4.5%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.9%
Communication Services	4.5%	10.4%
Energy	4.1%	3.3%
Utilities	3.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.1%

Return for Risk

DBEF vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF

DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 60
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IWB

IWB Risk / Return Rank: 66
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBEF	IWB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.98	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.68	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.71	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.24	12.38	-2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBEF vs. IWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and IWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEF	IWB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.98	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	0.74	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.83	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.45	+0.10

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IWB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEF	IWB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.46%	-55.38%	+22.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-8.86%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.62%	-19.09%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.95%	-25.20%	+10.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.46%	-34.60%	+2.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-2.58%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-10.85%	+6.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.94%	+0.30%

Volatility

DBEF vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEF	IWB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	3.74%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	9.37%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	12.20%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	17.14%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.81%	18.16%	-2.35%

DBEF vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEF vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than IWB's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	5.07%	5.55%	1.29%	4.46%	15.85%	2.28%	2.41%	3.03%	3.22%	2.98%	2.55%	3.70%
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	0.93%	1.00%	1.14%	1.31%	1.56%	1.09%	1.37%	1.71%	2.06%	1.64%	1.89%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEF and IWB in my portfolio?

DBEF and IWB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBEF or IWB?

IWB has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IWB's -55.38%.

Which ETF is better, DBEF or IWB?

On 10-year performance, IWB leads with 14.97% vs 12.28% for DBEF. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEF or IWB?

Over the 10-year period, IWB has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEF or IWB?

IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for DBEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEF or IWB?

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 0.93% for IWB.

What is the main difference between DBEF and IWB?

DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while IWB is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.15% for IWB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.