DBC vs. VWRA.L
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBC returned 12.01%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for VWRA.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than VWRA.L's 9.28% return.
DBC
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 31.80%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 40.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.28%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 31.80% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 4.48% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 9.28% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and VWRA.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between DBC and VWRA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBC
VWRA.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DBC
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Communication Services
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Energy
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Healthcare
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Industrials
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Real Estate
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Technology
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Utilities
DBC
-
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
VWRA.L
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBC | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 2.91 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 12.14 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBC | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.05 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.76 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -33.62% | -42.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -8.78% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -16.26% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -26.06% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.76% | -2.80% | -20.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -5.37% | -40.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.11% | +1.28% |
Volatility
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 3.96% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 9.93% | +6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 12.51% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 15.35% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 17.24% | +0.58% |
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.53% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and VWRA.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for DBC and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer